difference in replacement and reinstatement clause in the po

Message Author
Add to del.icio.us
Add to YahooMyWeb
Add to Simpy
Add to BlinkList
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:31 am   Post subject: difference in replacement and reinstatement clause in the po  

I would like to understand difference in replacement and reinstatement clause in the insurance policy and its impact during claim settlement
sandeepkunte
New member
Leave a quick message


Joined: 26 Jan 2009
Posts: 1


1.31 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:38 pm   Post subject:   

Hi dear..

I guess the replacement clause states till what worth the loss would be replaced by your coverage. On the other hand, reinstatement of coverage is mostly about reactivation of the coverage benefits following a stoppage/termination due to non-payment.

Roddick
roddick
Senior member
Leave a quick message

roddick
Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 468


81.39 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:49 pm   Post subject:   

sandeepkunte, kind of sounds like two different topics you've asked about you can have a policy that gives you replacement coverage, or an endorcement that does same, but reinstatement would have to do with the policys status, ie, you were less than ten days late when you made your premium payment so your police was reinstated without a lapse in coverage. please be more specific re: your question and i'm sure we can help you out.
_________________
**************************************
Life gaurantees a chance NOT a fair shake
**************************************
FIND a way EVERY day to lighten the load of another
**************************************
Lori
Moderator
Leave a quick message

Lori
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 6810
Highets Points
Location: Missouri
44.12 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 6:44 am   Post subject:   

Reinstatement is when you ask the insurer to put a lapsed policy back into effect with a promise to pay the premium for the entire period. It, however, would depend upon the insurance company's discretion whether or not to allow reinstatement of the plan. As far I know, after a certain period of time even reinstating a plan doesn't remain a feasible option to the policy holder.

Replacement clause of a policy would guarantee that the insurer would replace the damaged object instead of paying the actual cash value for it.

I agree with Lori you have combined two different topics into one.
Juanita
Moderator
Leave a quick message

Juanita
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 467

Location: Idaho
100.81 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:22 pm   Post subject:   

re-reinstatement as opposed to having to re-issue a policy i think this is both state dependent and carrier...meaning the carrier can be more lenient, in my state it's ten days (auto policys) you have up to ten day after the expiration to pay that premium for it to reinstate it, after that, it lapses and a new policy would have to be issued...
_________________
**************************************
Life gaurantees a chance NOT a fair shake
**************************************
FIND a way EVERY day to lighten the load of another
**************************************
Lori
Moderator
Leave a quick message

Lori
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 6810
Highets Points
Location: Missouri
44.12 Dollars($)

Quick Reply
Your Name
Subject
Message body
All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

Ask Community Experts

flash plugin

Quick Links
Must See
Community
Hot topics in forums

Latest in blogs